July 12, 2024
Search
Close this search box.
Search
Close this search box.
July 12, 2024
Search
Close this search box.

Linking Northern and Central NJ, Bronx, Manhattan, Westchester and CT

When one reaches a certain age, he does not have to be reminded that his memory is not what it used to be. These days, one receives e-mails, unsolicited of course, with such titles as “Eight Tips for Improving Memory,” and “Preventing Memory Loss in the Aging Person.” Undoubtedly, one of the conse­quences of the passage of the years is the fad­ing of some, but certainly not all, memories.

But it is not only older people for whom memory is problematic. Younger people as well forget a lot. Moreover, even those mem­ories that they retain are often modified, if not distorted.

Our ability to substantially change the memories we have of past experiences is brought home to me forcefully almost eve­ry week. As the faithful reader of this column knows full well, I often share my recollections of events in my life as the background for my comments on the weekly Torah portion. Very frequently I receive e-mails from old friends and classmates protesting that these recollec­tions are inaccurate. Typically, it is my young­er sister Judy, who chastises me and declares: “That’s not the way I remember it.” Or, increas­ingly lately,” You must have made up that one!”

What about memories of a group? Sure­ly, when a group of friends, for example, gets together after many years and discusses their memories, they will all agree about what tran­spired. Yet, if you ever attended a class reun­ion, you came away impressed by how differ­ent people remember events very differently.

The Jewish nation specializes in memory. We remember the Sabbath, the Exodus from Egypt, and a host of other historical experi­ences. We even remember our enemy, Ama­lek. Sociologists have termed such memories “collective memories.” One wonders whether collective memories remain intact over time, or whether different groups of descendants re­member their ancestors’ experiences different­ly.

This week’s Torah portion, Parshat Shelach (Numbers 13:1-15:41), contains a description of the beginning of the ordeal of spending 40 years in the wilderness, or midbar. The story is a familiar one. The spies returned from their mis­sion and spoke words of despair and discour­agement. The Almighty was angered by this and by the people’s reaction to the spies’ re­port. He expressed His anger harshly: “Not one shall enter the land in which I swore to settle you…Your carcasses shall drop in this wilder­ness, while your children roam the wilderness for 40 years, suffering for your faithlessness…”

Forty years of wandering must have left an indelible impression upon the collective memories of the Jewish people. Yet, note how very discrepant versions of the wilder­ness experience developed over the course of the centuries.

On one hand, there are those who look back upon the years in the midbar as a time of opportunity for spiritual development. They see it as a time when the Jews could concen­trate upon Torah study without concern for mundane matters. After all, their needs were taken care of by the Almighty. They were fed the manna, food from heaven, and their cloth­ing showed neither wear nor tear. According to an ancient Midrash, Mechilta DeRabi Ishma­el, the Almighty knew that had the people en­tered directly into the Land of Israel they would have busied themselves with their fields and vineyards and would have ignored Torah. He, therefore, rerouted them through the desert, where they ate the manna and drank from the miraculous well and absorbed Torah into their very bodies.

Rabbi Yonatan Eybeshutz, in his collec­tion of sermons known as Yaarot Devash, uses idyllic terminology to describe the midbar experience: “With all their physical needs cared for, their time was freed to be totally devoted to the Lord, with no imped­iments and no distractions.”

Indeed, Rabbi Chaim of Volozhin, the early 19th-century founder of the famed ye­shiva of Volozhin, wanted his institution of higher learning to replicate the mid­bar environment. He dreamed of creating an institution in which the students gave thought to neither career nor creature com­forts, but were free to devote all their time, day and night, summer and winter, to pure Torah study, with nothing to deter them from that sacred goal. To a large degree, Rabbi Chaim was successful in achieving his dream.

The collective memory of men such as Rabbi Yonatan Eybeshutz and Rabbi Chaim of Volozhin was of 40 pleasant years of life in a placid wilderness, a paradise of sorts, in which men were free to indulge in Torah study in its most spiritual sense.

But we also have evidence of a very dif­ferent collective memory of the experience of 40 years in the midbar. One articulate ex­pression of this very different version is to be found in the commentary of Ramban, Nachmanides, on Exodus 12:42. He views the wilderness experience as the very oppo­site of a utopia. He sees it instead as a pre­cursor to the lengthy and persistent galut, the exile of the Jewish people from its land, the torture and persecution it endured, and its dispersal throughout the world

He writes: “All these 40 years were a time of great suffering, as it is written: ‘Remember the long way that the Lord…Has made you trav­el in the wilderness…That he tested you with hardships…He subjected you to the hardship of hunger.’ You had a total exile in a land which was not yours, but which was the realm of the snake, the serpent, and the scorpion.”

These two very different collective mem­ories force us to question which version is true. The answer is, as in so many oth­er such disagreements, that there is a grain of truth in both versions. For some people, and for some of the time, the wilderness ex­perience was an unsurpassed spiritual op­portunity. For others, and at other times, challenges prevailed, and deprivation and frustration were familiar phenomena.

All of us live, to one extent or another, in a “wilderness.” At times we feel that we are in paradise, and at times we are con­vinced that we are in the opposite of that. At times we use our “wilderness” for its spiritual richness, and at times we find the “wilderness” arid and barren.

Eventually, we will tell the story of our years in the “wilderness” to our chil­dren, and they will pass the story on to our grandchildren.

It should be no surprise to us that our grandchildren will then have differing ver­sions of what our experience was like. Col­lective memories differ because our world is complex. It is a world in which, as the Mid­rash puts it near the beginning of the book of Genesis, “light and darkness are intermingled.”

By Rabbi Dr. Tzvi Hersh Weinreb

Leave a Comment

Most Popular Articles