Search
Close this search box.
November 22, 2024
Search
Close this search box.

Linking Northern and Central NJ, Bronx, Manhattan, Westchester and CT

Omitting the Obvious

For Chris Christie, it was a chance at redemption. After his last big appearance at a Jewish event ended in con­troversy following his utilization of a provoc­ative term to describe the Judea and Samaria region in Israel, the New Jersey Governor and Republican presidential hopeful was expected to make amends when he took to the podium as a featured speaker at yet another high-pro­file Jewish affair.

The posh awards dinner in Manhattan for The Values Network, which was founded by Rabbi Shmuley Boteach, featured an array of impressive guests and speakers. Among those in attendance was Republican mega-do­nor Sheldon Adelson, Nobel laureate Elie Wie­sel, actor Sean Penn, Texas Governor Rick Per­ry, Israel’s Ambassador to the United States Ron Dermer, Harvard law professor Alan Der­showitz, and Jewish philanthropist and Birth­right founder Michael Steindhardt. The event was a perfect opportunity for Chris Christie to prove that his “occupied territories” gaffe was an anomaly and that his support for Israel is strong and unwavering.

Yet, when Governor Christie delivered his remarks in a speech that was laden with for­eign policy references, he inexplicably left out a key word that left the crowd scratching their heads in bewilderment and wondering what had just happened. Throughout his 16-minute speech, Christie did not mention the word “Is­rael” once. At no time during his remarks did he directly refer to the Jewish State by name.

Consider the implications of Chris Christie’s decision. This well-publicized gala was wide­ly perceived as a pro-Israel event. The crowd in attendance was overwhelmingly pro-Isra­el. In fact, the public relations firm that pro­moted the “Champions of Jewish Values Inter­national Awards Gala” for The Values Network in advance of the event declared that Christie would deliver a “major speech on Israel and the Middle East.” Despite that, in what could only be described as an enigmatic decision, Christie concluded that not specifically referencing Is­rael was somehow a good idea.

Christie’s glaring omission became even more evident after Rick Perry, another Republi­can governor that is angling for the GOP presi­dential nod, delivered an impassioned address that invoked Israel at every turn. Governor Perry talked about his numerous trips to Isra­el, empathically stated that the United States must renew its commitment to a strong Isra­el, and noted that Israel has a right to exist as a Jewish state.

The road to the White House is inevita­bly replete with pitfalls. With the spotlight of the world illuminating their every move, pres­idential candidates will unquestionably stum­ble and fall on occasion. Often, the hurdles that cause presidential candidates to falter are com­plex public policy issues that prove to be chal­lenging to navigate successfully. Yet, seldom does a presidential candidate trip and fall over an issue that on its face appears to be a no-brainer.

To be clear, I am not questioning Chris Christie’s position on Israel. As I wrote after his blunder at the Republican Jewish Coalition’s Annual Spring Conference in Las Vegas, that troubling incident was in no way evidence that Christie is anti-Israel; rather, it demonstrated that he needs to be better prepared.

In my opinion, the same statement holds true today. Chris Christie’s bizarre choice to omit the word Israel from his recent speech was both curious and confounding, but it is not indicative of how he feels about the Jewish State. What Christie’s latest faux pas does is call into question the Governor’s judgment and his readiness to step out onto the national stage.

No one can honestly tell me that leav­ing Israel out of a speech to a pro-Israel crowd at a pro-Israel event is a good idea. I doubt that anyone can convince me that it makes any sense whatsoever.

In the aftermath of Governor Christie’s re­cent address, one of his closest friends and top political advisers, Bill Palatucci, was quoted in the Wall Street Journal as saying that when it comes to Israel, Christie has a strong record of support. “He’s well known to be supportive,” said Palatucci. “He doesn’t need to wear it on his sleeve every time he’s in front of a Jewish group.”

There is some truth to that statement. As Jews, we certainly do not need to be pan­dered to by every politician who is seeking our support. However, there is a big differ­ence between Chris Christie “wearing his support for Israel on his sleeve” and side­stepping the topic altogether. There is a happy medium, but Governor Christie has apparently not yet to come to that realiza­tion.

A word of advice to Governor Christie: In the future, when addressing a pro-Isra­el crowd, do not ignore Israel. In this in­stance, omitting the obvious was not a pru­dent political approach.

N. Aaron Troodler is an attorney and principal of Paul Revere Public Relations, a public relations and political consulting firm. Visit him on the Web at TroodlersTake. blogspot.com, www.PaulReverePR.com, or www.Jew­ishWorldPR.com. You can also follow him on Twitter: @ troodler

ByN. Aaron Troodler, Esq.

Leave a Comment

Most Popular Articles