We cannot be expected to contribute to the general good at the cost of our committing collective suicide.

(Reprinted from Future of Jewish)

Writer’s note: I have requested anonymity for this essay because there is intense social pressure on American Jews to be anti-Israel, especially on campuses. I am a professor at a liberal arts college where there is intense hostility toward Israel; my Zionism has already caused me to become a pariah on my campus.

If I was to publicly take the next logical step — conclude that drastic political changes are required to stem the public tide of Jew-hatred, even as drastic as supporting the presidential candidate “they” all uniformly despise — I sincerely believe my personal safety would be in question. That is why this essay both needs to be published and to be anonymous. The situation is that dire.

That somber moment when the flight attendant said, “Though we do not anticipate a change in cabin pressure,” so heavy with portent (at least for those of us with darker dispositions), and then the sage advice: “If you’re traveling with someone who may need assistance, put your own oxygen mask on first.”

Sage, if perhaps unnecessary, given the normal human instinct for self-preservation. I am reminded of the “Seinfeld” episode in which a fire breaks out at a children’s birthday party and George knocks children and elderly out of the way in order to escape. A moment of levity back then, the final calm perhaps, before the storm, back when being Jewish was still somewhat cool.

This may just be my darker disposition speaking, but I believe the cabin pressure has changed.

If you do not already know this or perhaps have been out of the United States — or off the planet — for the past year, a brief survey should catch you up. Franklin Foer summed it up back in March with his article in The Atlantic titled, “The Golden Age of American Jews is Ending.” That title, though perhaps optimistic in using the present continuous rather than past perfect, nailed it.

Combine it with Jacob Savage’s 2023 article, “The Vanishing: The Erasure of Jews From American Life,” documenting the disappearance — a euphemism for “exclusion” — of Jews from academia, from all sorts of leadership positions, cultural institutions, activist organizations, legal positions such as judgeships, prestigious fellowships like Guggenheims and MacArthurs, and so on.

An article from just last week by Joshua Hoffman is entitled, “American Jews Are Increasingly Excluded From Leadership Positions — Because They Are Jewish.” Being Jewish is also increasingly uncomfortable (another euphemism) in medical schools, law schools and (anecdotally, though not yet well-documented) business schools.

The vanishing is complete in the public university system of New York City, once extraordinarily friendly to Jews in the American city with the largest Jewish population, now the largest urban university system in the country with some 25 campuses and approximately 230,000 people — where “of the top 80 senior leadership positions including campus presidents, as of April 2023, there were zero Jews remaining.”¹

Five years ago the ever-prescient Liel Leibovitz urged Jews to “get out” of the elite American university system where they were so clearly unwelcome; well, that call has been heeded, if not by the Jews themselves, then by the administrators and admissions officers who have kept them out, as the percentages of Jews in the Ivy League has plummeted over the last decade or two.

As Armin Rosen’s article last year put it, we have witnessed an “Ivy League exodus.” Professor of politics Eric Kaufmann found that just 4% of elite American academics under 30 are Jewish (compared to 21% of boomers).² The steep decline of Jewish editors at the Harvard Law Review(down roughly 50% in less than 10 years) could be the subject of its own law review article.

Put it all together and we have seen what can only be called a purge: a purge of Jews from public life, from leadership, from elite institutions and, most forebodingly of all, from the pipeline itself. If Jews are being hounded out of medical, law and business schools, the next generation of physicians, lawyers and businesspeople will be sparse with Jews.

If Jews are being hounded out of elite universities and graduate programs — if the past year of relentless demonstrations and riots expressing hatred and sometimes violence toward Jews on major campuses does not convince you, then nothing will — the next generation, not just of leaders but specifically of professors, will be sparse with Jews.

If that is the case, universities will only continue becoming less and less friendly (euphemism for more and more hostile) toward Jews, and that Jew-less pipeline will propagate itself and intensify, becoming ever emptier of Jews as Jews nearly entirely disappear from all aspects of public life.

This is not just my darker disposition speaking.

It seems to me an objective fact that while we were distracted, living it up with our bagels and schmears and “Curb Your Enthusiasm” binging, the cabin pressure itself plummeted — and now, like George Costanza, we need to follow Leibovitz’s advice and “get out.”

What “getting out” looks like in practice can take many forms in many contexts, but there is one immediate, pressing way it should manifest itself.

I am, like so many largely secular American Jews, a lifelong Democrat. There are many obvious reasons for this. So many such Jews see themselves as “liberal,” as caring and empathetic. They stress Judaism’s concern for the oppressed and marginalized, they are attracted to at least their own conception of Judaism’s famous notion of tikkun olam. Yes, they were largely all in on supporting Black Lives Matter, #MeToo, the various rainbow coalitions, and they see all that as better aligned with the traditional Democratic Party than with the Republicans.

These Jews want to be good people and do good things. True to that, they have not merely made major contributions over the years to science, medicine, education, business and culture — throughout our “Golden Age” — but, given their nature and ambitions, used their success and status in these endeavors to become philanthropists and benefactors.

We are all aware of the disproportionate number of Jewish names on hospitals and university buildings, just for a start. America has been good to the Jews and the Jews returned the favor in being good citizens, in being good for America. Jews want to continue to do good, and so many, as I myself have for years, see the Democratic Party as the better fit to do that good.

But now, my fellow Jews, we can only continue to do that good, as Jews, if America allows us. If, within the next generation, we are excluded from leadership positions, from medical, law and business schools, from elite colleges, from all areas of public life, where exactly will we be? In the past year we have seen so many of those university buildings with Jewish names being vandalized with hostile messages projected onto them, even getting renamed by rogue students.³ What Jewish benefactors will there be to donate those buildings and support their programs if there are no Jews among the leaders in American society?

Jews can only do all the good they like to do, they are driven to do, which their Judaism teaches them to do, if they are allowed to flourish in society. We are not asking for a handout or any “privilege” — the code word that has been weaponized to motivate the purge — but the same opportunity to work hard for what we achieve that we seek to afford to others.

Nor are we asking for it all. We are not the fictional, defamatory Elders of Zion that used to be the exclusive delusion of right-wing antisemitism but has increasingly been co-opted by the left. We are very big on sharing, on diversity, on inclusion. We are very big on fighting injustice, on helping the marginalized and the oppressed improve their situation and status.

Most of us were all in on the social justice movement of the past decade, even as we were increasingly aware that we were among its primary targets. I remember deciding to continue supporting the Black Lives Matter movement even after reading the vile antipathy to Israel included on its online platform.

But now: Never mind the obvious concern about our being excluded, ghettoized, discriminated against and marginalized ourselves; we cannot be expected to contribute to the general good at the cost of our committing collective suicide.

We simply cannot do all the good we want to do if we are vanished. And it is precisely all this that is in play across the spectrum.

As a lifelong Democrat it pains me to say this, but it seems obvious to me that the assault against Jews will only get worse under a Kamala Harris administration. Here are just a few reasons why:

1. One of Harris’ first actions as the presumptive Democratic Party’s presidential nominee was to boycott Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s address before a joint session of Congress. Israel, engaged in an Iranian-led, multi-front war for its survival, suffered the worst attack in its history on Oct. 7. Rather than standing by America’s closest Middle Eastern ally, Harris specifically snubbed its prime minister to placate the emerging anti-Israel (really, anti-Jewish) bloc of the Democratic Party.⁴
2. According to the Wall Street Journal, Harris intends to replace Secretary of State Antony Blinken with Phil Gordon, a far-left activist who worked with the pro-Iran lobby, the National Iranian American Council. Gordon, now serving as Harris’ national security advisor, has a long history of seeking to advance the interests of the Islamic Republic of Iran. He is currently under a congressional investigation due to his ties to the regime. Gordon has also written numerous pro-Islamic Republic op-eds and even a book advocating for a rapprochement with the ayatollah.
3. According to a recent article, there are indications that Harris would appoint Maher Bitar as director of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence should she win the presidency.⁵ At Georgetown University, Bitar was a leader of the antisemitic, pro-Hamas organization, Students for Justice in Palestine, and he has hosted conferences praising Islamic terrorism.

As author and columnist Melanie Phillips recently noted: “Harris has fueled the current tsunami of anti-Jewish hatred by recycling the lies and blood libels against Israel that have been spread by Hamas and its Western stooges for the past 10 months. Ignoring the reality of plentiful food supplies in Gaza and the thefts of aid by Hamas, she accused Israel of causing starvation there so that families were ‘eating leaves and animal feed’ and children were ‘dying from malnutrition and dehydration.’

“In an attempt to court votes among the Muslim voters of Dearborn, Michigan she met the town’s radical mayor, Abdullah Hammoud, who the day after the Oct. 7 pogrom tweeted: ‘Israel’s decades of illegal military occupation and imprisonment of Gaza make peace impossible and tragic violence inevitable.’

“Even more disturbing is Harris’ apparent tolerance for the Iranian regime. In January 2020, she helped push through the House of Representatives the ‘No War Against Iran Act’ to prevent any money from being used for unauthorized military action against Iran. She also has a close relationship with members of the National Iranian American Council, which reportedly collaborates with Tehran.”⁶

I will add that the social and political forces which the Biden-Harris administration has succored, the far-left wing of its party that it continually appeases, the numerous Jewish-unfriendly political appointments and policy decisions they have made, and the continuous hostility to Israel that goes along with the occasional proclamations (and sometimes appreciated gestures) of support all strike me as the upper cabins opening up and the oxygen masks dropping down.

Where has the Biden-Harris’ Justice Department been as university and primary school antisemitism has exploded over the past year?

Just this week, 24 state attorneys general issued a letter warning Brown University of legal and fiscal consequences should Brown choose to divest from Israel; 22 of the 24 work for Republican administrations while Democratic administrations seem almost universally disinterested in combating the antisemitic divestment movement sweeping over dozens of campuses.

Add to these concerns the fact that all indications are that Harris atop the ticket will be even less friendly to Israel and to American Jews than has the Biden-Harris Administration, starting with her personnel choices and her regular expressions of compassion and empathy toward the pro-Hamas cohort of her constituents.

I now ask every liberal Jewish Democrat to honestly confront the facts about the Jewish purge presented above, begun some years ago but deeply accelerated during these last four Biden-Harris years and especially during the past year, and honestly ask themselves whether a Harris administration will likely slow, simply accept or accelerate that purge.

As a lifelong Democrat, I share antipathy for Donald Trump, both on the personal level and the political. And though it pains me to say this, I must admit: Trump just stated that “there has never been a more dangerous time since the Holocaust if you happen to be Jewish in America,” and for once I agree with the man.

As a lifelong Democrat, I find Trump to be profoundly flawed, not to be trusted and far from a panacea regarding the problems above — but it also seems obvious to me that on this one question, at least, the question of Jewish life and status in America, a Trump administration is less likely to accelerate the purge and possibly might slow it, or at least try.

I have a close friend, another lifelong Democrat, a fellow secular liberal Jew, a committed Zionist whom I deeply respect but whose antipathy for Trump (like many) outweighs the concerns just sketched. His response to these concerns was to say that he cares deeply about several issues: the environment and climate change, upholding democracy and Israel and American Jewish life, among others. Though he agrees with my analysis, he plans to vote for Harris, saying that he will vote on the first items and lobby hard on the Israel-Jewish item.

I understand that, and even respect it, but I think it is shortsighted.

That so many Jews want to “do good” — to give back to the country that gave them so much, to support the oppressed and the marginalized — is wonderful, a true reflection of the second rhetorical question of the ancient Jewish sage Hillel’s famous saying: “And if I am only for myself, what am I?”

But we cannot forget the first part of it as well, which, in my view, not only chronologically but logically and necessarily must come first: “If I am not for myself, who will be for me?”

Nobody can be asked to help others at the cost of committing collective suicide. Nobody can help anybody else unless they have the resources to help. You cannot be for others unless you are first for yourself, even if you see being “for yourself” as the means toward the end of being “for others.”

That is of course why you must put your oxygen mask on first, because you cannot be of assistance to anyone else if you are dead or disabled.

My aforementioned friend is a lawyer, a committed Zionist, but one who must keep his Zionism on the down-low because, you know, it could cause complications for him, both professional and personal. He wants to continue doing all the good things we as Jews are prone to do: save the environment, save democracy, and support the marginalized — all of which traditionally manifested itself through the Democratic Party and liberalism.

But the way things are going, the way the purge has accelerated especially since October 7th, if word of his Zionism gets out — he may well be out of a job, if not on the receiving end of one of the pogroms — yes, pogroms — that have already occurred in his (by the way, very Democratic) city.

Not a whole lot of good you can do when unemployed, or beaten up or ostracized into the ghetto — or dead.

For the greater good, for all the good you admirably want to do: You need to save yourself first.

Hillel of course concludes, “And if not now, when?” Well, apparently, we do for the moment have an answer to that otherwise rhetorical question: Nov. 5th,, the date of the next U.S. presidential election.

I cannot help but think that, for the greater good, secular liberal Jews like me, lifelong Democrats, might be best advised to hold our noses and vote for — no, I cannot bring myself to say it and I feel so bitter at the Democrats for putting me in the position that I find myself actually preferring the victory of that man.

But say it I must: If you can vote for the Republicans, represented by that man, then do it. But if you cannot — at least do not vote for Kamala Harris.

It appears that I am not alone in reaching this difficult conclusion, as there are reports that Jewish voters are gravitating away from the Democratic nominee in unprecedented numbers.⁷

But for those remaining Jews in America, still perhaps the majority, please consider, lastly, the fact that I must publish this anonymously for my own safety is itself the best argument for its conclusion.

The purge tolerates no dissenters.

1 SAFE CAMPUS on X

2 Eric Kaufmann on X

3 “Penn denounces projections of pro-Palestinian messages onto campus buildings as ‘antisemitic’.” The Daily Pennsylvanian.

4 Shelley G on X

5 “Kamala Harris’s BDS Problem.” Commentary Magazine.

6 “The anti-Jewish candidate.” Melanie Phillips.

7 “New Jewish Voices for Trump group targets leftist “radical antisemitism.” The Jewish Chronicle.

Future of Jewish is the ultimate newsletter by and for people passionate about Judaism and Israel. Subscribe to better understand and become smarter about the Jewish world.